Google Summer of Code 2020: D-Complete and Mobile Posets

-
In this post, I thought I'd overview the work of my first paper, which has just recently been accepted to SIDMA. 

In order theory, a linear extension of a partially ordered set P is a totally ordered set L which respects the original ordering P. Many famous problems can be converted into counting the number of linear extensions. For example, the number of standard Young tableaux of a given shape is equivalent to the number of linear extensions of a poset with the same shape.

Unfortunately, it is #P-complete in general to count linear extensions (even for posets of height 2!). However, there are famous classes of posets like Young diagrams (or more generally, d-complete posets), which have efficient computation. In our paper, we presented a new class of posets called mobiles that have determinant formulas for counting linear extensions and generalize d-complete posets and ribbon posets.


Since this past summer converted me into a shut-in, I decided to spend some of that extra time to participate in Google Summer of Code. With Travis Scrimshaw, I implemented the work of my paper in SageMath.  

For code documentation and access, see this meta-ticket, which has links to everything. But here's a quick tldr of the main contributions:

1. Created classes and examples for various families of posets (i.e. d-complete, mobiles)
2. Added functions to identify when a poset is d-complete, mobile, etc
3. Added new functions to efficiently count the number of linear extensions of d-complete and mobile posets. 


If you plan to use this code, please let me know! I'd love to see this being used. 

In the future, I plan to add q-analogues of mobiles, which unfortunately did not fit in the time frame of Google Summer of Code. 




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Learning Bounded Arithmetic -- A Guide from a Novice

-
Bounded Arithmetic is a field of mathematical logic which, very roughly, studies subtheories of Peano Arithmetic that "correspond" with reasoning associated with computational complexity classes or propositional proof systems. Correspond here can mean multiple things, but the two most common interpretations would be the prized Witnessing Theorems or Paris-Wilkies Propositional Translations. At the Simons Institute program for Meta Complexity this winter, many attendants (including myself) wished to learn bounded arithmetic due to its increasing appearances and connections with other areas of complexity. Marco Carmosino, Oliver Korten, and Jan Pich organized a bounded arithmetic reading group to go through many elementary and recent works in bounded arithmetic, with a preference towards those results relating to meta complexity. However, with the creation of the reading group, a running joke was spawned: " I won't define this bounded arithmetic theory " Every we...
Read more

Extension Complexity Part II - Classifying Nonnegative Rank by Randomized Communication

-
A classical result from Yannakakis states that $$\text{xc}(P) = \text{rank}_+(S),$$ where \(P\) is a polytope with slack matrix \(S\). Yannakakis further showed that with nondeterministic communication complexity, one can give a lower bound for the nonnegative rank. This lower bound is sufficient to prove that some polytopes, like the correlation polytope, have exponential extension complexity. However, it fails for many other examples.  In a 2013 paper, "Extended formulations, nonnegative factorizations, and randomized communication protocols," by Faenza, Fiorini, Grappe, and Tiwary, they show that a model of randomized communication complexity can not only lower bound nonnegative rank, but exactly characterize it.  In my communication complexity reading group, I gave a talk presenting this paper and its results. The proofs are extremely elegant and simple, making for a very enjoyable read.  For those interested, here is a link to my lecture notes! 
Read more